↩ Jacob's Ephemerata

A blog of aggregated miscellanea and things I like uncovered from my daily travails. I'm @jacobjay, a peripatetic designer/developer of British persuasion, having interests in gastronomy, fashion, technology, interiors and sustainability. I'm currently living between New Delhi and France, working on a Lua web platform and e-commerce. I dig Macs, mountain biking and smelly cheese.

Anonymous asked: The picture you just posted isnt yours. The person who originally posted it had almost 4K notes on it, and you're a dick who's trying to steal it.

They may (or may not) have been the first person to post it on Tumblr, but simply posting an item does not imply its ownership (territorial or otherwise) by the person who posted it. Anyone who [re]posts something [almost always] has a legal obligation to correctly attribute (identify) the original creator. In my own case, when I find an item that is attributed I may simply ‘reblog’ in the way you accuse me of failing to do, however if it is not attributed I post it afresh having correctly attributed the item myself. See my earlier post on this very subject.

More notably you presume that there is only one valid way to post stuff (reblog). If a newspaper ran the same picture would you accuse them of the same, or someone (heaven forbid) on Facebook? I may have wished to publish that item for my audience in some manner of my own and thus not have the original poster’s description (and thousands of ‘notes’ attached to it)…

Maybe in the case you cite (but I don’t know to which item you refer), the poster was indeed the creator, in which case my fresh post would nonetheless have attributed the creator (as required) and very likely provided several more links to their works. There are regrettably of course some cases where I am unable to identify an original author, not least because nobody else has been bothered to do anything other than click ‘reblog’ without considering who created it.

I won’t call you a dick, because your punctuation is ~99% accurate, and your concept of moral obligations and digital ownership is worth considering.

“When to take my name off the door”, a visualisation of Leo Barnett’s 1967 speech on creative satisfaction (and making money); by Brazilian studio Lobo, via Co.Design.

Lichtreise’ A map visualisation using light painting (long photographic exposure of moveable light sources), demonstrating that powerful visualisations of data need not been created digitally (although it has been enhanced digitally).

when I see people complain about the process of getting free money or that the chairs in the offices are bad then I laugh, because I think they have no perspective of what it takes to build a business, how hard building a business is for majority of people
Entrepreneurship depends on a sense that the present order is an unreliable and cowardly indicator of the possible. The absence of certain practices and products is deemed by entrepreneurs to be neither right nor inevitable, merely evidence of conformity and lack of imagination.

‘Moon Dust’ by Spencer Finch.

‘an american in paris’ by Evan R. Campbell.

Nothing is sacred. (by mobstr.)

The Independente Hostel & Suites Lisboa 

Dencity’ a visualisation of worldwide population density. 36” print available for $30.

The Dos And Don’ts Of Food Snobbery 

«NEVER correct pronunciations unless it’s absolutely necessary. If Italians can get away with dropping vowels, you can let your friends pick them up. “Moozarell” and “Mozzarella” mean the same thing to waiters. I promise.»

Designing a product is keeping five thousand things in your brain and fitting them all together in new and different ways to get what you want. And every day you discover something new that is a new problem or a new opportunity to fit these things together a little differently. And it’s that process that is the magic.

Steve Jobs, in a 1995 interview; via Daring Fireball.

Nature restores human nature, yet human nature underestimates the value of nature. This tendency precludes our ability to take advantage of nature’s restorative power while leading to nature’s destruction.

via ‘The Paradox of Nature and Human Nature?’ on 77Zero.; citing from “Underestimating Nearby Nature: Affective Forecasting Errors Obscure the Happy Path to Sustainability.  The Paradox of Nature and Human Nature?” by Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski.

(Source: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

More Information